Nothing was charged on any
credit cards. But my peace of mind had dissolved and my
paper went unwritten. So that’s my
excuse,
along with waiting too long to finish it. That’s when I
decided sometimes I’d rather not have to think for
myself. I’m kidding
of course, but maybe, Dystopia is fun sometimes.
This got me to thinking about our
hero Mae in Dave Egger’s book “The Circle.” Why had she
decided to suppress her emotions so many times in this
novel, going against her own conscience
and what she felt was comfortable? The answer lies in the
need for comfort and security. It also
shows how easily somebody can be controlled when you lavish all
kinds of gifts upon them. Mae
is not that much
different from you or I. She wants to provide for herself. She wants her sick father
to
get the proper care he needs. When it’s realized that her
parents are able to be put on her medical plan,
the pressure is compounded as well. Mae feels a need to
prove herself. She starts going to more
meetings, accepting copious invitations to parties and
luncheons that she no longer has time for. Her life
becomes all about the Circle.
When
Mae decides to go on a Kayak ride, she is given a guilt trip. Why would she
want to go
alone? Why not post it onto the online forum and see if
other employees from the Circle would want to
go? But anybody knows that when you’re making plans it
becomes so much more complicated with each
extra person invited. Mae soon begins to realize that she
doesn’t have the luxury of alone time
anymore. The spontaneity
of the past is gone. She must do whatever she can to keep this job.
Nicholas Carr, when writing his book the
Shallows, makes some interesting observations about
Google and it’s godlike omniscience in the lives of it’s
employees. On page 151 he mentions how
“Google recruits volunteers for eye tracking and other psychological
studies at their in-house usability
lab.” And that “Google continually introduces tiny permutations
in the way it’s sites look and operate,
shows different permutations to different sets of users, and
then compares how the variations influence
the users’ behavior- how long they stay on a page, the way
they move their cursor about the screen,
what they click on, what they don’t click on, where they go
next.” All of this research greatly
contributes
to Google’s bottom
line. And Google is no different than many other businesses out there.
I once
worked for an App development company and one of the Startups we were working
with
wanted to be able to take user information based on all past
purchasing and push coupons and
advertisements towards them. This is something we are seeing
more and more of. I’m afraid that even
though transparency is convenient, people are losing
something sacred at the same time. On
page 202
in the Circle, Francis records a sexual interaction with
Mae. Even though she is startled by this, she has
become so used to
these intrusions of technology that she no longer seems to be capable of
outrage. Is
this what having cameras on our phones is setting us up for?
“I won’t
advertise it or anything,” Francis assures her. And there’s really nothing she
can do. She
is so caught up with becoming transparent that she figures
she just has to let it go. The other end of the
coin is that there is probably so much stuff out there,
eventually, it doesn’t matter if a video of you
having sex is out there because people will probably ignore
it.
What
Mae doesn’t seem to realize in this story is that for every newfound freedom
and
convenience that she accepts, she seems to give up more and
more of her freedoms. It makes me think
of the 40th law in Brian Greene’s book “The 48
laws of power” where he states “What is offered for free
is dangerous- it usually involves either a tick or a hidden
obligation. What has worth is worth paying for.
By paying your own
way you stay clear of gratitude, guilt, and deceit. It is also often wise to
pay the full
price- there is no cutting corners with excellence. “ Although, I do realize she is not trying to
get by as a
freeloader, I recognize how easy it is to sometimes takes
the shortcut. But Mae is merely doing what a
lot of us do. Because
it’s fun to surrender and be part of the pack. People
in general crave a sense of
belonging. But is the workplace the proper place to find
this sense of belonging? Are we designed
to
choose our social schemes around people who happen to be
found in our workplace?
Mae’s
friend Annie, who initially is ther person who got her the position at this
place, is a
mentor of sorts. She constantly calms Mae down and urges her
to fall into line. When
misunderstandings happen, like Mae unknowingly turning down
an invitation for a Portugese themed
party, Annie assures her it’s not that big of a deal, that
these things happen to everybody at the Circle.
Everybody seems to revere Annie. It’s a lot for poor Mae to
live up to. So she gives it her best. She works
extremely hard to prove that she is worthy of the gifts
bestowed upon her. She soon is working
overtime to become the dynamo of social media that everybody
at the company is encouraging her to
be. And she seems to be having fun. Because Dystopia can be
fun.
Even in Orwell’s dystopian novel 1984, where employees take
a mellowing drug called Soma, people are
generally content. It’s all some people care about. The
danger is that eventually does society begin
punishing those who don’t fall into line?
No comments:
Post a Comment